Posts

Showing posts with the label BABRI MASJID CASE

Babri demolition case: SC asks judge to deliver verdict within 9 months

Image
The Supreme Court Friday asked the special judge conducting trial in the politically sensitive 1992 Babri Masjid demolition case, involving BJP veterans such as L K Advani, M M Joshi and Uma Bharti, to deliver the verdict within nine months from today. A bench of Justices R F Nariman and Surya Kant said the recording of evidence in the case should be completed within six months. The bench also directed the Uttar Pradesh government to pass appropriate orders within four weeks to extend the tenure of the special judge, who is set to retire on September 30. The top court said the extension of tenure of the special judge will only be for the purpose of concluding the trial and delivering the verdict in the case. During the extended tenure, he will remain under the administrative control of the Allahabad High Court, it said. The special judge had on Monday moved the apex court seeking six more months to conclude the matter. Besides Advani, Joshi and Uma Bharti, the accused...

Sacred Games-Rajiv Gandhi case: Delhi HC watches show, finds nothing urgent

Image
The plea alleges that certain scenes and dialogues in the show defame former PM Rajiv Gandhi Current Affairs News : The Delhi High Court on Monday sought to know whether it could hear as a PIL a plea claiming that some scenes in the Netflix series "Sacred Games" are derogatory to former prime minister Rajiv Gandhi and should be removed.  A Bench of Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Chander Shekhar asked the petitioner's advocate to first advance his submissions on the point of maintainability of the plea as a public interest litigation (PIL) and listed the matter for further hearing on July 19. The Bench said it has gone through the CD of the series, placed on record by the petitioner, and there was nothing urgent in it as all the episodes have been aired. It also asked how the actors could be held liable for enacting their characters. The court said a person is entitled to express his views, which may be right or wrong, and asked the petitioner to satisfy it ...