Reel vs real: The politics behind the life and crimes of Sanjay Dutt
As the debate about depiction of public figures in bio-pics
continues, Sunil Dutt's attempts to bail his son out recounted.
Current Affairs News:
When a film
about a public figure is made, many questions relating to the accuracy or
inaccuracy of portrayals arise. In a vibrant democracy, multiple truths often
jostle with each other, so that we can determine for ourselves which one (or
ones) we prefer. We must also ponder if any biographical film, condensing a
life into two-and-a-half hours, takes certain departures from reality. In this
sense, Sanju, a biopic on actor Sanjay Dutt is no exception.
In
a particular scene in Sanju, Dutt is seen playing court to a political figure
in Delhi, months after he was charged with the crime of possessing an AK-56
rifle and hobnobbing with those suspected of carrying out the bomb blasts in
Bombay (now Mumbai) on March 12, 1993. The politician in the movie is rather
indifferent and dismissive of Dutt’s plea.
In
real life, it was actor-turned-politician Sunil Dutt who had indeed courted a
political figure. He had once informally told a gathering of journalists – including
the author – that he had approached Sharad Pawar, who became chief minister of
Maharashtra soon after the bomb blasts, begging for leniency for his son. Sunil
Dutt recalled bowing before Pawar, tears rolling down his cheeks, when he
noticed that the politician was faintly smiling, enjoying his ordeal. Stunned
and disillusioned, Sunil Dutt subsequently met Shiv Sena supremo Bal Thackeray,
who eventually came out in support of Sanjay Dutt, declaring publicly he did
not believe that any member of the Dutt family could be ‘anti-national’.
Story
Source-> BS
Comments
Post a Comment