Kashmir: Why amendments to Article 370 may not withstand judicial scrutiny



"I say with all respect to our Constitution that it just does not matter what your Constitution says; if the people of Kashmir do not want it, it will not go there. Because what is the alternative? The alternative is compulsion and coercion...We have fought in good fight about Kashmir on the field of battle... (and) ...in many a chancellery of the world and in the United Nations, but, above all, we have fought this fight in the hearts and minds of men and women of that State of Jammu and Kashmir."
- Nehru, speaking in the Lok Sabha in 1952
Nehru’s promise lies in tatters today; as does every other promise of autonomy made by the Government of India. Article 370 gives a ‘special status’ to the State of Jammu and Kashmir. On Monday, the Government effectively abolished that status. It did so without touching the provision. It also brought in a constitutional amendment, without amending the constitution. Crucially, it did all of this after zero consultation with the people affected by it all. Before delving into the legalities of what happened in Parliament, it is imperative to understand the background in which Article 370 was made a part of the Indian Constitution. Read More



Article Source -> Business Standard

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Cafe Coffee Day names S V Ranganath as interim chairman

Kohli only Indian among Forbes highest paid athletes, Messi tops the list

Mia Khalifa engaged to beau Robert Sandberg